Marin- 7/9/2026
Let me be straightforward with you before anything else. The Zone Recovery EA is not a typical forex robot you set up and forget about. It is more of a trading tool, one that demands real understanding before you put it on a live account. I have tested it across several accounts, including a live Darwinex Zero-funded account, and the results range from genuinely promising to, frankly, quite alarming.
Zone Recovery EA is a MetaTrader recovery hedging expert advisor developed by TGO that attempts to close losing trades at a combined profit by opening opposite-direction hedge positions with progressively larger lot sizes inside a defined recovery zone.
This review covers my real testing experience, including what went wrong on the live account, because that part matters just as much as the wins.
What Is Zone Recovery EA?
At its core, Zone Recovery EA implements what is sometimes called the “never losing strategy.” When a position moves against you, the EA places a hedge trade in the opposite direction with a larger lot size. If price reverses, both trades eventually close at a combined profit. The recovery zone is the price range within which the EA manages this basket of trades.
The software is available on MQL5, and TGO also offers a lifetime subscription covering all of their EAs, including other systems I have reviewed, such as Global Trade Plan EA and Prime Scalper EA.
There are two main ways to run it:
- Standalone mode: Use the built-in trading strategies included in the EA
- External EA mode: Pair it with another expert advisor, letting that system open trades while Zone Recovery EA takes control if things go wrong
I tested both approaches, and the external EA combination is what I found most interesting, though also most dangerous if configured carelessly.
Zone Recovery EA: Quick Risk Snapshot
| Feature | Details |
| Strategy type | Recovery hedging |
| Platform | MetaTrader |
| Developer | TGO |
| Mode | Standalone and external EA |
| Lot scaling | Multiplier (default x2) |
| Max hedge trades | User-defined |
| Unlimited hedge option | Yes (high risk) |
| Prop firm suitability | Limited |
Zone Recovery EA Settings Snapshot
| Setting | Setup 1 | Setup 2 | Live Account |
| Mode | External EA | External EA | External EA |
| Take profit (initial trade) | 50 points | None set | Higher target |
| Hedge activation gap | 1,200 points | 600 points | 57 points |
| Max hedge trades | 5 | 5 | 0 (unlimited) |
| Lot type | Default | Multiply x2 | Custom step |
| Remove stop loss | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Remove external EA | No | Yes | No |
That last column tells the story of what went wrong, and I will get to that shortly.
Demo Account Testing: Two Setups, Two Months
Before touching a real account, I ran two demo setups on separate $1,000 accounts for nearly two months. Both combined Zone Recovery EA with an external strategy generated through EA Studio.
Setup One: 50-Point Target, Fixed Gap at 1,200 Points
This configuration set a 50-point take profit on the initial trade. When the price moved against the position, the EA removed the stop loss and take profit from the original trade, then placed a hedge in the opposite direction. The hedge gap was 1,200 points, meaning the price had to travel 1,200 points before the recovery trade triggered.
Most trades closed right around that 50-point target. On the ones that went against me, the recovery hedge kicked in with an increased lot size, and the basket eventually closed at a profit. Average monthly gain: above 4%.
Setup Two: No Initial Take Profit, Multiply Lots x2, Gap at 600 Points
This one worked differently. No take profit on the initial trade, the EA was completely removed from the chart when Zone Recovery took control, and hedge lots multiplied by 2 with each consecutive trade: 0.02, then 0.04, then 0.08, then 0.16, and so on.
That multiplier escalates quickly. With a maximum of 5 hedge trades set, exposure stays manageable, but it is worth thinking carefully about what that sequence means in margin terms. Average monthly gain on this setup: above 2%.
Both accounts remained profitable after two months. Setup One reached a floating loss of around 4% at one point, and Setup Two touched nearly negative 10% before pulling back.
What Happened on the Live Darwinex Zero Account
This is the section I want to be especially honest about.
I chose Darwinex Zero for the live test because of the $100,000 starting capital, which provides significant margin for a recovery hedging system to keep opening trades. That logic was sound. The configuration was not.
The critical mistake: I set max hedge trades to 0, meaning unlimited hedging. Combined with a hedge step of just 57 points, the EA started firing off recovery trades very rapidly when USD/JPY moved sharply. Within minutes, the position grew to 15 lots across multiple hedge trades. Then the price continued moving away from the recovery zone, the margin ran out, and no further hedge trade could open to rescue the last losing position.
The result is a large floating loss with no active recovery mechanism remaining. The balance line on the account looks reasonable; the equity line tells a very different story.
I have kept the account running to observe what happens by month’s end, then plan to restart it with the verified demo setup. Darwinex Zero operates on a monthly subscription model, so the financial damage is contained, but the experience makes clear how fast things can unravel.
Zone Recovery EA vs. Grid and Martingale EAs
You might be wondering how Zone Recovery compares to other accumulation-based strategies. The differences are meaningful, and I think this comparison gets overlooked in most reviews.
| Feature | Zone Recovery EA | Grid EA | Martingale EA |
| Direction switching | Yes | No | No |
| Exposure growth | Conditional on zone breach | Linear, position by position | Exponential with each loss |
| Margin failure risk | Zone breakout without margin | Sustained trend continuation | Rapid loss escalation |
| Prop firm suitability | Low | Very low | Very low |
| Recovery mechanism | Opposite-direction hedging | Averaging down in one direction | Larger bets after losses |
| Setup complexity | High | Moderate | Low |
The key distinction is how each system responds to adverse price movement. Grid EAs add positions in the same direction as price moves against you, accumulating linearly. Martingale doubles down after each loss, which produces fast, exponential exposure. Zone Recovery switches direction entirely, which sounds safer but introduces its own specific failure mode: if price exits the recovery zone decisively and keeps going, every hedge trade is also losing, and the system has no answer for that.
In some ways, that makes Zone Recovery EA more dangerous than a standard martingale in trending market conditions. At least with a martingale, you only have positions in one direction. With zone recovery, you can end up heavily exposed in both directions simultaneously.
Safer Zone Recovery EA Settings: What Testing Showed
Based on two months of demo testing and the live account experience, here is what I would consider a more responsible configuration framework. These are not official recommendations from the developer; they reflect what I found from actual testing.
Settings that reduced risk without eliminating the strategy’s core function:
- Max hedge trades: 5: This is probably the single most important setting. Unlimited hedging sounds like better recovery protection, but it produces runaway exposure when price trends strongly. Five is a reasonable ceiling.
- Hedge gap: 600 to 1,200 points: The 57-point gap on the live account was the direct cause of the rapid loss escalation. A wider gap means fewer recovery trades trigger, but each one has more room to work.
- Lot multiplier: x2 maximum: Higher multipliers accelerate recovery but also accelerate the path to margin exhaustion. Staying at x2 keeps the sequence from becoming unmanageable within five trades.
- Unlimited hedging: avoid entirely: There is no tested scenario where removing the hedge cap improved outcomes. The theoretical benefit of unlimited recovery does not survive contact with a genuine trending market.
- External EA pairing: use only with filtered entries: Pairing Zone Recovery EA with a well-tested external system that has clear entry logic reduces the frequency of recovery situations. The better the initial trade quality, the less often the hedging mechanism needs to activate.
The live account failure came from departing from every one of these principles simultaneously. That is the real lesson here.
Pros and Cons of Zone Recovery EA
What Works Well
- Highly configurable; nearly every parameter can be adjusted to suit your specific situation
- Works well as a companion tool alongside external expert advisors, particularly those built in EA Studio
- Has recovered accounts in real testing when the setup stayed within appropriate parameters, and the price remained in the zone
- Built-in strategies mean an external EA is not strictly required
- Available with a lifetime MQL5 subscription covering multiple TGO systems
What to Be Careful About
- Unlimited hedging with a small gap is dangerous; this is not a theoretical concern, it happened in live testing with real consequences
- Can be more risky than martingale or grid systems in strongly trending markets
- Requires a genuine understanding of the settings before going live; adapting a demo configuration thoughtlessly for live conditions is a reliable way to lose an account
- Floating losses can grow to uncomfortable levels even on setups that eventually recover
- The x2 lot multiplier per hedge trade produces exponential exposure within just a few trades
Who Should Consider Zone Recovery EA?
This is not a beginner tool. I want to be direct about that.
It may suit traders who:
- Already understand recovery hedging mechanics and are comfortable monitoring floating drawdowns actively
- Want a companion system for an existing external EA rather than a fully standalone robot
- Prefer hands-on oversight rather than set-and-forget automated operation
- Are you testing on a funded account platform like Darwinex Zero, where the subscription model limits personal financial exposure during the setup phase
Less appropriate for:
- Traders expecting consistent, low-drawdown performance results without close monitoring
- Anyone not willing to spend time reading documentation and running proper demo testing first
- Those operating accounts where a large floating loss would trigger a margin call or breach funded account drawdown rules
Algo Trading Space: Follow the Live Results
The Zone Recovery EA test account with Darwinex Zero is tracked on the Algo Trading Space platform. You can see the balance and equity lines there without any editing, including the periods where the floating loss grew significantly. That level of transparency matters; if a system is struggling, it gets shown as-is.
For traders who want closer access to ongoing performance data, early insights on systems being tested, and direct support from the team, the Algo Trading Space VIP club is worth a look. VIP members will also get a dedicated video covering Zone Recovery EA settings in much more detail, including the configurations being tested after the live account restart.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Zone Recovery EA, and how does it work?
Zone Recovery EA is a MetaTrader expert advisor developed by TGO that uses a recovery hedging strategy. When an initial trade moves against the trader, the EA places a hedge trade in the opposite direction with an increased lot size.
This process can repeat multiple times, with all trades in the basket eventually closing at a combined profit once the price returns to the defined recovery zone. It runs standalone using built-in strategies or alongside an external expert advisor, managing recovery if that system’s trades go into loss.
Is Zone Recovery EA safe to use on a live account?
It depends entirely on the configuration. In demo testing with a maximum of five hedge trades and appropriate gap settings, both setups remained profitable over two months. On a live Darwinex Zero account using unlimited hedge trades and a 57-point gap, the result was a substantial floating loss when USD/JPY moved sharply out of the recovery zone.
The EA is capable of recovering accounts, but aggressive settings can cause significant losses faster than most traders expect.
What is the difference between unlimited and limited hedge trades in Zone Recovery EA?
Setting max hedge trades to a fixed number, such as five, caps the number of recovery positions the EA can open. This limits both the recovery potential and the risk of runaway losses. Setting the value to zero removes that cap entirely, allowing unlimited consecutive hedges.
While this sounds like stronger protection, it can result in the account running out of margin before recovery completes, leaving the final position open with no hedge trade available to rescue it.
Can Zone Recovery EA be paired with other expert advisors?
Yes, and this is one of its more practical applications. The EA includes an external EA mode where it monitors positions opened by another system and takes control if those trades move into a loss. Settings allow it to recognize trades by magic number, remove the original EA from the chart during recovery, and reattach it once positions close.
This pairing was tested with EA Studio-generated strategies, and the combination worked well in demo conditions when hedge parameters were set conservatively.
How does the lot multiplier setting affect risk in Zone Recovery EA?
The multiple lot setting increases each consecutive hedge trade by a defined factor. At a multiplier of 2, trade sizes double with every hedge: 0.02 lots, then 0.04, then 0.08, then 0.16. While this increases the probability of recovery by weighting later trades more heavily, exposure also grows exponentially.
Running this without a max hedge limit is particularly dangerous. Even with a cap of five trades, the final position in that sequence carries eight times the exposure of the first trade.
Where can I follow live Zone Recovery EA performance results?
The Algo Trading Space platform tracks live trading results for the Zone Recovery EA Darwinex Zero account. Performance data, including equity and balance lines, is published without editing, showing both profitable periods and the current large floating loss. The Algo Trading Space VIP club provides exclusive access to detailed strategy breakdowns, live statistics across multiple systems, and early updates on how the setup is being adjusted after the live account restart.
Is Zone Recovery EA suitable for prop firm trading?
Based on current testing, this system is not well-suited for prop firm accounts with strict drawdown rules. Floating losses during demo testing reached nearly negative 10%, and the live Darwinex Zero account experienced a much larger floating drawdown.
Prop firms typically enforce hard drawdown limits between 8% and 12%, and a recovery hedging system caught in an adverse trend can breach those thresholds before recovery completes. If used in a funded environment, conservative settings with a strict max hedge limit and a wide gap would be essential, and even then, the risk is significant.
